<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Beta 3 Add-ons Manager and Add-ons API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laurathomson.com/2008/02/firefox-3-beta-3-add-ons-manager-and-add-ons-api/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laurathomson.com/2008/02/firefox-3-beta-3-add-ons-manager-and-add-ons-api/</link>
	<description>Laura Thomson's random thoughts and rants about tech and FOSS</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Sep 2008 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: blausand</title>
		<link>http://www.laurathomson.com/2008/02/firefox-3-beta-3-add-ons-manager-and-add-ons-api/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>blausand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurathomson.com/?p=111#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Hi Laura,
nice to see you are still busy with Mozilla.
Months ago i suggested to the community some sort of loadtime and RAM-footprint details for each Add-On, not just the download-size. I'd like to know how much code is added or replaced by an add-on and how much it prolongs the loadtime of firefox/thunderbird on a standard system. Unfortunately, i never received a reaction,
maybe you could post here or tell me of a site more relevant for making that suggestion?
thanks a lot,
blausand
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laura,<br />
nice to see you are still busy with Mozilla.<br />
Months ago i suggested to the community some sort of loadtime and RAM-footprint details for each Add-On, not just the download-size. I&#8217;d like to know how much code is added or replaced by an add-on and how much it prolongs the loadtime of firefox/thunderbird on a standard system. Unfortunately, i never received a reaction,<br />
maybe you could post here or tell me of a site more relevant for making that suggestion?<br />
thanks a lot,<br />
blausand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Wagoner</title>
		<link>http://www.laurathomson.com/2008/02/firefox-3-beta-3-add-ons-manager-and-add-ons-api/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Wagoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurathomson.com/?p=111#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I think search should probably place greater emphasis on the title of an add-on than the description text. At the moment, in FF3b3, searching for Interclue (for instance) pops up a theme that happens to support Interclue, and one must click through to the site to get the actual addon.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think search should probably place greater emphasis on the title of an add-on than the description text. At the moment, in FF3b3, searching for Interclue (for instance) pops up a theme that happens to support Interclue, and one must click through to the site to get the actual addon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funTomas</title>
		<link>http://www.laurathomson.com/2008/02/firefox-3-beta-3-add-ons-manager-and-add-ons-api/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>funTomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurathomson.com/?p=111#comment-104</guid>
		<description>G'Day Laura. I just wonder, is it necessary to search across all the languages? When looking up for a name, the search should IMO occur only in the user-selected language.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;Day Laura. I just wonder, is it necessary to search across all the languages? When looking up for a name, the search should IMO occur only in the user-selected language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
